Innovative approaches to working capital optimization
This article is a contribution from our content partner, Kyriba Working capital is the lifeblood of any successful business, but optimizing it in today’s volatile environment requires more than just best practices. It demands innovation, collaboration, and real-time intelligence. If you caught our first post, you know that amid economic uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, rising inflation, and shifting consumer demands, working capital has become a lifeline for resilient businesses. We explored why optimizing working capital is crucial in today’s unpredictable landscape and shared foundational strategies for getting started. In this follow-up, we move from the “why” to the “how,” highlighting innovative approaches and smart moves companies are using right now to optimize working capital, overcome bottlenecks, and drive business growth. Identifying and eliminating inefficiencies Before you can fully optimize working capital, you need to uncover hidden bottlenecks that are slowing you down. Supply chain volatility, fluctuating shipping rates, and outdated processes can disrupt cash flow and limit flexibility. Common bottlenecks include: The Solution? High-performing businesses are leveraging automation and real-time tools to minimize these challenges. By automating payment workflows, digitizing invoice approvals, and using cash visibility platforms, these companies are freeing up trapped cash, reducing friction, and streamlining their cash conversion cycles. Leveraging data analytics for timely insights In an era of rapid change, intuition is not enough, but neither are manual systems or siloed processes that often lead to disconnected, delayed decision-making. Many organizations still operate with limited visibility into their supply chains, leaving them vulnerable to costly disruptions and concentration risk. A recent CFO Brew article on supply chain visibility highlights just how little awareness some companies have of their third-tier and indirect suppliers, and how this lack of insight can expose them to risks that may not surface until months after an event. Without robust, real-time data, businesses are forced to make “feel-good decisions” that simply don’t work in today’s fast moving, interconnected world. Leading organizations are moving beyond intuition and manual processes by turning to advanced data analytics and technologies that provide deep, actionable visibility across their supply chains. By harnessing big data and predictive analytics, companies can: But visibility alone isn’t enough. The real differentiator for leading organizations is the ability to rapidly and decisively move from insight to action. Forward-thinking finance teams aren’t just identifying cash positions or spotting inefficiencies; they’re empowered to act on those insights in real time. That means having the tools to seamlessly leverage idle cash through payables strategies, accelerate receivables when needed, or dynamically adjust working capital allocations as market conditions shift. Platforms that combine full cash visibility with integrated action, such as enabling payables financing, receivables financing, and dynamic discounting unlock a new level of working capital agility.This holistic approach ensures that finance leaders aren’t just observers of data, but active participants in shaping outcomes. It’s this marriage of intelligence and execution that’s setting new benchmarks for resilience and growth in today’s market. Collaboration across teams boosts efficiency Optimizing working capital is no longer just a treasury responsibility. The most successful companies treat it as a cross-functional challenge, requiring close collaboration between treasury, supply chain, and procurement teams. For example, when tariffs and trade policies shift, procurement must work hand-in-hand with treasury to anticipate the impact on payables and inventory levels. Here’s how collaboration can make a difference: This integrated approach ensures that every dollar invested in inventory, payables, or receivables is working as hard as possible for the business. Rethinking innovation in working capital strategies True innovation in working capital optimization isn’t just about adopting the latest tools—it’s about fundamentally reimagining how people, processes, and platforms connect to unlock value. Today’s most successful organizations no longer treat treasury, procurement, and supply chain as separate, siloed functions. Instead, they are building integrated ecosystems where data flows freely, decisions are collaborative, and action can happen in real time. From my experience, organizations leading the way are: The real breakthrough comes when companies move beyond visibility alone and empower teams to act on insights, turning working capital from a static metric into a dynamic lever for resilience and growth. Innovative CFOs and treasurers are partnering with platforms that offer unified visibility across cash, payments, and working capital, creating real-time command centers for liquidity performance. In summary, working capital optimization is about more than incremental improvements. It means rethinking how teams connect, how data is harnessed, and how technology is deployed to enable rapid, confident decision-making. By identifying bottlenecks, fostering collaboration, and embracing real-time analytics, organizations can unlock new cash flow and build lasting resilience. Read more from Kyriba Join our Treasury Community Treasury Mastermind is a community of professionals working in treasury management or those interested in learning more about various topics related to treasury management, including cash management, foreign exchange management, and payments. To register and connect with Treasury professionals, click [HERE] or fill out the form below to get more information. Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
Franklin
European Fintech Vendors Risk Losing to Global Giants
Written by Enrico CamerinelliSupply Chain & Finance- Strategic Advisor Helping European Fintech Vendors Break Into Commercial Banking The Uncomfortable Truth[1] European fintech firms have since now faced challenging market conditions, including funding constraints and increased competition that lead to consolidation among smaller players. This is mostly driven more by macroeconomic factors (e.g., post-2021 funding environment, interest rate changes) than by incumbents systematically taking their accounts. However, with banks wanting unified platforms, the provision of best-of-breed fintech solutions for trade finance, supply chain finance, payments, and core banking risk of no longer satisfying procurement teams. European fintech vendors face stark choices: dominate a niche, seek acquisition, or invest heavily in platform expansion to compete with established giants. Technology No Longer Differentiates Documentary credit processing, invoice financing automation, and supply chain visibility tools have become commoditized. Banks can access similar functionality from multiple providers, compressing margins and trapping vendors in a feature-parity race. Procurement criteria transformed completely. Banks evaluate integration depth over feature breadth. Questions focus on seamless treasury system connections, data orchestration across tech stacks, network effects through banking partnerships, and integration with ERP systems. Technical excellence has become merely the entry fee. Winning vendors embed themselves into broader commercial ecosystems, linking trade finance with receivables platforms, connecting supply chain data with working capital facilities, and orchestrating multi-bank arrangements. Standalone point solutions face commoditization and price pressure. Survival depends on building genuine network effects through critical mass adoption and becoming the integration layer banks cannot easily replace. Mistakes Regional Vendors Make Competing on Features European vendors deplete engineering budgets chasing feature parity with incumbents. When procurement teams create comparison matrices with hundreds of feature checkboxes, the fintech player has already lost. Global vendors have decades of client requests baked into bloated platforms. You cannot out-feature them. What actually closes deals is implementation speed (e.g., 12 weeks versus 18 months); genuine API-first architecture without middleware complexity; and support teams responding in hours instead of weeks. A European fintech vendor spent €2M building a rarely-used reconciliation module because “the RFP required it,” while burying their 48-hour integration capability that saves banks six months and €500K on page nine of their pitch deck. Geographic Dilution Vendors waste millions pursuing “pan-European” strategies while home market advantages evaporate. A Dutch vendor dominated trade finance in the Netherlands, then pivoted to become pan-European. They translated platforms into four languages, hired country managers in Milan and Madrid, and redesigned workflows for every European regulatory framework. Revenue grew 12%. Burn rate tripled. Meanwhile, a focused German competitor captured their Rotterdam pipeline through superior execution in digitizing letters of credit and accessing liquidity from funding partners. Deep integration with domestic customs systems, connections with local bank relationship managers, and understanding of regional supply chain seasonality have now become footnotes in generic marketing. Successful vendors do the opposite: they double down on core strengths and find similar micro-markets elsewhere. A Norwegian trade finance platform targeted seafood exporters specifically. First in Norway, then Scotland, then Galicia. Same buyer, same letter of credit complexity, same regulatory knowledge. They stayed narrow and won. Undervaluing Physical Presence European fintech vendors risk of burning millions believing superior technology opens doors. It doesn’t. A platform with physical presence in one country outperforms brilliant cloud-native solutions sold remotely every time. European commercial banks don’t buy technology. They buy relationships, regulatory comfort, and the ability- sad but true- to blame someone local when things fail. When trade finance infrastructure fails at 3 AM and €50M in letters of credit are stuck, procurement officers want someone they can call who speaks their language and understands their market. Not a chatbot. Not a support ticket. A person in their country who comprehends local nuances. The Five-Question Framework Question 1: Can You Name Three Clients? Strategic clarity means that you, fintech vendor, can name three clients using your platform successfully, describe the exact pain points your solution solved, and articulate why they’re referenceable. If this takes longer than an hour, then you are not ready to scale. Better run smaller pilots, gather proof points, and build references that sell. European banks reward evidence over enthusiasm. Question 2: What Should You Stop? Strategic retreat may be more valuable than expansion plans. Not all geographies deserve attention. Vendors too often waste months trying to crack corporates in one country while pipelines in another go cold. Southern Europe’s decision cycles stretch beyond Series B timelines. If you’re sub-€10M in annual revenue, pick two markets maximum. Kill feature bloat. Your blockchain-based documentary credit module that three clients requested? Eliminate it. That AI-powered risk scoring you’ve built for eight months while banks request better Excel exports? Stop. Question 3: How Do You Amplify Regional Advantage? I see fintech vendors lose pipeline not because their technology is weak, but because roadmap priorities misalign with how banks actually buy. You build features existing clients requested while prospects dismiss you after strong POCs. Current clients optimize for operational efficiency. Prospects need proof that you solve their strategic pains. Be that regulatory compliance or correspondent banking costs. Audit your next two quarters. Map every roadmap item to sales objections that cost you deals. Ruthlessly deprioritize features that don’t directly address prospect concerns. Your client success team will complain. Your sales team will close deals. Question 4: Who Should You Partner With? European fintech vendors pour millions into flashy banking partnerships while ignoring unglamorous middlemen who actually close deals. System integrators (SIs) and regional consultancies (the ones banks actually listen to) sit untapped. In commercial and trade finance, procurement doesn’t start with your CMO’s LinkedIn post. It starts when a bank’s trusted system integrator flags capacity constraints during core banking upgrades. Vendors land three implementations in six months through one well-placed SI relationship. Deals that would’ve taken 18 months of direct prospecting. Question 5: What Does Victory Look Like? Your realistic first-year market share in European commercial banking isn’t 15%. It’s 2-3% if you’re exceptional. Regional banks with €20-50B in assets are desperate for digitization but ignored by major providers. They…