Blog – 2 Column

How Swap Automation Reduces Risks And Costs

How Swap Automation Reduces Risks And Costs

This article is written by Kantox FX swaps are one of the most widely used instruments in currency management. The omnipresence of swaps and forwards in fx-risk-management is best understood by glancing at recent estimates by the Bank for International Settlements: “FX swaps and forwards had reached the $130 trillion mark in late 2024. The rise in the notional value of FX derivatives was driven mainly by greater positions in FX swaps and forwards” — BIS A currency swap is equivalent to a package of forward contracts. On the one hand, an amount of currency is bought or sold against another currency with a given value date. On the other hand, the reverse trade takes place, but with a different value date.  FX swaps are used in a variety of companies, asset managers and banks with different hedging-strategies. In 2023, the Riksbank —the Swedish central bank— hedged part of its foreign exchange reserves with swaps, selling USD and EUR against SEK. This blog discusses, in the context of corporate fx-risk-management, the following topics: Using swaps to adjust currency hedging Ensuring a perfect match between the settlement of commercial transactions and the corresponding FX hedges is next to impossible.  To bridge the gap between these positions, swapping is necessary. Swaps allow treasury teams to: Consider the following ‘early draw’ example. Company A  has an open forward position to buy $1,000,000 against EUR at a forward rate of EUR-USD 1.1100. The position was taken several months before to hedge a forecasted commercial exposure. Company A now faces a payment of $100,000 related to that exposure. Swapping is therefore required to ‘draw’ on that forward position. There are two ‘legs’ this transaction:  Thanks to this transaction, the treasury team not only obtains the required amount of dollars on the spot — its forward position at the original value date is also automatically adjusted. Quite naturally, FX gains/losses will be involved, as the exchange rate has shifted. This simple example illustrates the enormous practical value brought by swaps. As companies execute such transactions on many thousands of occasions on any given day, we can understand why total FX forwards and swaps stand at more than $130 trillion.  The costs and risks associated with manual swap execution Treasurers know it too well: swapping is complex and resource-intensive. Day in, day out, we encounter situations that show the stress members of corporate-treasury teams find themselves in as they execute the indispensable FX swap transactions: When manually executed, the process of using FX swaps to adjust the firm’s hedging position can be so cumbersome that currency managers may fall victim to the siren song of so-called flexible forwards. Here’s an example. A Canadian importer of vaccines and other medical inputs hedges its CHF-denominated purchases with flexible forward contracts. The treasury team likes the flexibility of fully or partially settling the forward contract during one month for the same rate.  But what is not fully transparent to the team is the high costs of the process. This is because, as the company’s liquidity providers protect themselves from FX risk, they set the exchange rate at a date that is more convenient to them in terms of forward points, i.e., the difference between the forward and the spot rate.  If the company needs funds before expiry, it pays the desired amount of Swiss francs at the CHF-CAD rate of the value date of the forward contract, instead of the lower rate that would correspond on account of the Canadian dollar’s forward discount to CHF (about 3.34% for 12 months). Swap automation to the rescue Faced with an array of costs and risks, beleaguered members of the treasury teams can turn to API connectivity to solve the many operational and cost-related challenges related to swap execution.  Going back to the Canadian firm cited above, we backtested an alternative way of letting the company draw on its currency forwards: swap automation. The savings are material: they represent about 0.20% of the firm’s traded volume, which is equal to a third of the savings from forward points in a layered FX hedging program (not discussed here). And that’s only for one currency pair. Add the other currency pairs, and the proposed connectivity to a multi-dealer corporate FX trading platform, and pretty soon we are talking hundreds of thousands of (Canadian) dollars in savings. As Ignacio Recalt, Treasury SaaS and Payments Product Owner at Kantox says:  “Swap automation frees up resources and removes operational and other risks. Whether they need to anticipate or roll over FX forwards linked to payments/collections, treasurers can execute the process in one click.” With complete visibility and control, the finance team obtains: ‍ The illustration below shows how PowerBI displays the perfect traceability between swap legs and the underlying FX forwards of a hypothetical user:  ‍ ‍ Conclusion. Treasurers of the world: automate! Although it represents only one of the many tasks that treasury teams execute on a daily basis, the process of swap automation neatly encapsulates the benefits of API-centred Currency Management Automation: Also Read Join our Treasury Community Treasury Masterminds is a community of professionals working in Treasury Management or those interested in learning more about various topics related to Treasury Management, including Cash Management, foreign exchange management, and Payments. To register and connect with Treasury professionals, click [HERE] or fill out the form below to get more information. Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.

Webinar Recap: De-Dollarisation & How Treasurers Can Build the Right Hedging Strategy

Webinar Recap: De-Dollarisation & How Treasurers Can Build the Right Hedging Strategy

Hosted by Treasury Masterminds and Ebury Resources from Ebury For those wanting to dig deeper into the trends shaping de-dollarisation: Download Ebury’s De-Dollarisation Playbook Free FX Audit from Ebury The final webinar of the year landed with a full house and a topic treasurers clearly can’t get enough of: the shifting role of the US dollar and what it means for hedging strategies in 2026 and beyond. We brought together two complementary perspectives: Below is a breakdown of the key themes and insights for those who couldn’t join live. The Audience Warm-Up: What’s Your Biggest USD Challenge? We opened with a poll. Three choices, one predictable winner: Treasurer everywhere apparently bonded over volatility-induced stress. The Real Story Behind De-Dollarisation Despite dramatic headlines, de-dollarisation is not a sudden-collapse scenario. Both speakers clarified: The shift away from the USD is slow, policy-driven, and structural. Key drivers behind the trend Camille highlighted a major behaviour shift in markets:The old correlation between global volatility and a stronger USD is breaking. Asset managers have started hedging USD exposures they historically left open, and those flows helped push EURUSD higher in 2024. On the Ground: How Treasurers Are Actually Paying Neicy gave an unfiltered view from Angola, where USD scarcity can slow or halt critical operations. Key takeaways: It’s not pretty, but it works. And it shows how far treasurers must stretch when macro conditions refuse to play along. The Blind Spot: “Dollar In, Dollar Out” Isn’t Zero Exposure A common misconception: Using USD on both the buy and sell side equals a natural hedge. Camille explained the trap: If your counterparty’s functional currency is not USD, they carry FX risk too. And they often hide that risk in pricing. One example: Chinese suppliers often increase RMB prices when USD weakens but rarely lower them in the opposite scenario. The result is an invisible premium. Switching to local currency invoicing (RMB, EUR, BRL…) can strip out these markups. Should Treasurers Hedge More in Local Currencies? Often, yes. Benefits: RMB liquidity is now strong, so the old argument of “difficult to hedge” no longer really applies. Clients who switched saw reduced costs and clearer pricing. Yes, renegotiation takes effort. But that effort pays for itself. Hedging Strategies Treasurers Are Turning To 2025 saw a noticeable shift: 1. Layered hedging over simple rolling hedges Spreads timing risk, reduces exposure to single bad entry points. 2. Option-based structures resurface Treasurers want: Options provide that balance. 3. Greater focus on cost of carry Forward points have moved.Hedging long tenors is now cheaper than earlier in the year. 4. Multi-currency optimisation If USD hedging is expensive while BRL or EUR hedging is favourable… adjust the portfolio. Treasurer Reality Check Neicy made one of the session’s most candid points: “When we don’t know, we don’t do.” Many emerging-market treasuries simply lack stable markets or instruments needed to hedge conventionally.Their main levers: Sometimes survival absorbs the full definition of “hedging.” Final Advice for Treasurers Heading Into 2026 From Neicy From Camille Together their message was simple: Treasury is changing. Markets are changing. Hedging strategies must evolve too. Watch the Full Webinar Recording If you want the full conversation, audience Q&A, and all the nuance, the full session is now available on Spotify. Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.