Inside Treasury’s Debt Dilemma—and How to Tackle It With Confidence
This article is written by Palm Treasury teams don’t just manage cash. They manage complexity — and few things are more complex, and operationally demanding, than debt management. What starts as a practical financing approach — taking on a few loans to fund growth or stabilize liquidity — often turns into a sprawling network of financial obligations. It’s not unusual for treasury teams to manage dozens of loans across institutions, each with their own terms, rates, and covenants. When treasury teams manage dozens of loans across different maturities and interest rates, they often face fragmented debt management, operational overload, and scattered data across disconnected systems — risking missed payments, covenant breaches, and the consequences of loan defaults, credit rating drops, or public market fallout. This isn’t just a data issue. It’s an operational strain with strategic consequences. The Compounding Complexity of Debt Debt operations often evolve faster than the systems built to manage them. A few tactical loans can quickly spiral into a time-intensive burden. Tracking obligations is just the start; managing their growing ripple effects across the business is where complexity compounds. Each loan brings its own terms, rates, maturities, and covenants. A small oversight can have big consequences. And even when each loan is manageable alone, together they create a workload that demands constant vigilance. Add in shifting market conditions, stricter lender terms, and rising expectations from internal stakeholders, and debt turns from a supporting tool into a defining factor in how treasury teams perform. One loan? A spreadsheet works. Ten loans? You’re checking calendars. Fifty loans? You’re at risk of missing something important — not because the team isn’t skilled, but because the system wasn’t built for it. As loan volume grows, treasury teams face: This leads to a constant juggling of inputs and subsequent outputs. And in practice, even highly competent teams find themselves spending more time managing process than optimizing outcomes. What Treasury Teams Want to Avoid The stress of managing debt manually doesn’t just wear on time and resources — it wears on confidence. If repayments are missed or covenants are breached, the consequences escalate quickly. Lenders lose trust. Credit ratings are impacted. Risk od defaults. Internal stakeholders question reporting accuracy. And in today’s environment — where interest rates move faster, lender terms are stricter, and treasury teams are leaner — there’s little room for error. This operational overload creates serious risk that can waterfall: These aren’t edge cases. They’re common enough to make treasurers feel like they’re operating one step behind — all while CFOs demand sharper insights and faster reporting. Treasury’s credibility hinges on its ability to see what’s ahead and act early. Without the right infrastructure, that visibility collapses. What Better Looks Like A better approach doesn’t mean overhauling everything — it means integrating debt where it matters most. By folding debt directly into liquidity planning and reporting workflows, treasury teams unlock a smarter, more scalable strategy: With debt positioned as a core driver in your planning — not a side ledger — treasurers can make better decisions, sooner. They’re routine decisions — powered by accurate, integrated data. A more scalable, structured approach isn’t a luxury — it’s a necessity. When debt becomes part of the forecasting layer, treasury regains control. Instead of operating in the rearview mirror, teams can anticipate, model, and respond. The good news? There’s a clear fix — and it starts by bringing debt into the forecasting layer. That means: When debt lives inside your forecasting system — not adjacent to it — treasury teams unlock clarity. They can prioritize, consolidate, and renegotiate with confidence. Conclusion Debt is a powerful lever — but only if it’s managed with foresight. The best way to mitigate risk and regain control is by incorporating repayment schedules directly into your cash forecast and positioning cash accordingly. Smart positioning enables treasury teams to make deliberate, proactive moves: consolidating smaller loans, timing drawdowns with confidence, and renegotiating terms from a place of clarity. Just as importantly, covenants shouldn’t live in offline trackers. They need daily visibility. A central dashboard ensures nothing slips, so treasury leaders can focus on value — not risk response. This shift — from reactive to proactive debt management — is what separates teams that are firefighting from those shaping the future of treasury. The teams that adopt it now will be the ones setting the standard tomorrow. And that transformation begins with understanding where your process stands today. Also Read Join our Treasury Community Treasury Masterminds is a community of professionals working in treasury management or those interested in learning more about various topics related to treasury management, including cash management, foreign exchange management, and payments. To register and connect with Treasury professionals, click [HERE] or fill out the form below. Notice: JavaScript is required for this content.
Franklin
From Static Cash to Symphonic Liquidity: Orchestrating the Future with Stablecoins
Written by Sharyn Tan (Views are my own) Picture this: As a corporate treasurer, you’ve spent years fine-tuning the art of cash forecasting—building buffers for the inevitable delays, sweeping funds across borders like a conductor waving a baton at half-speed, and staring at dashboards that only refresh when the banks deign to open their doors. The dream? Instant visibility into every pool of liquidity worldwide. Zero dollars (or euros or yen) sitting idle, earning nothing. And the freedom to redirect capital precisely where it’s needed, the moment it’s needed—no more “T+2” alibis or weekend blackouts. For decades, that vision felt like a cruel tease, confined to glossy consultant decks. But stablecoins? They’re the quiet revolution whispering that it might finally be within reach. From where I sit—deep in the trenches of global treasury strategy—they’re not just another fintech fad. They’re the potential bridge to a world of continuous liquidity orchestration, where cash doesn’t just sit; it flows like a symphony, responsive and relentless. Let’s unpack this. Traditional liquidity management is a masterclass in predictability—or at least, the illusion of it. We rely on batch processes: inflows timed to the second, outflows queued for the next available rail, and everything swept into notional pools that ignore the chaos of cut-off times, holidays, and those pesky interbank handshakes that can drag on for days. It’s efficient enough for a 9-to-5 world, but in our 24/7 global economy? It’s like trying to stream a symphony on dial-up. Enter stablecoins—fiat-pegged digital assets like USDC or PYUSD, engineered for stability and speed. When integrated carefully, regulated and battle-tested, they could settle transactions much faster than many legacy rails, sometimes near-instant. For institutions, this could represent a fundamental rerouting of how liquidity moves. Suddenly, treasurers aren’t just managing positions; we’re orchestrating flows—programming capital to dance between entities, markets, and even yield opportunities in real time. Imagine the possibilities: That excess cash pooling in a European subsidiary at 2 a.m. UTC doesn’t languish; it auto-routes to cover a dawn supplier invoice in Singapore, shrinking your working capital cycle by precious days. Or USD balances in LatAm, tokenized and earning 4-5% in short-term instruments while awaiting the next capex call— all without lifting a finger. Precautionary liquidity buffers? They shrink because funds aren’t trapped by geography or clocks; it’s fluid, on-demand, and always earning its keep. I say possibilities because in reality, cross-jurisdiction FX conversions, capital controls and counterparty checks could still slow things down. Similarly, tokenized assets may unlock yield, but access depend on the asset’s regulatory clarity and risk profile—especially outside the G7. The Real Shift: Not Replacement, But a Hybrid Harmony Don’t get me wrong—stablecoins aren’t here to evict your trusty banking partners. Those relationships? They’re the bedrock: credit lines, compliance muscle, and the kind of trust that’s hard to code into a smart contract overnight. What stablecoins do is extend the orchestra, adding instruments that play faster and louder for the high-velocity parts. Think hybrid liquidity layers: • Traditional rails for the heavy lifting—high-value, regulated, deliberate – ideal for high stakes solos and foundational support. • Stablecoin rails for the agile chorus—low-friction, programmable, eternally awake – responding instantly to urgent cues The treasuries that thrive will blend them seamlessly on a single dashboard, routing flows with the precision of a maestro. One minute, you’re hedging FX exposure via bank APIs; the next, you’re settling intra-group transfers on-chain to dodge weekend voids. It’s not disruption for disruption’s sake—it’s evolution, turning payments from a cost center into a liquidity superpower. But here’s where the rubber meets the blockchain: This isn’t plug-and-play. From my vantage point, piloting these shifts reveals the traps lurking just off-stage—integration snags, systems need tuning, accounting ambiguities, and the ever-present specter of regulatory whiplash. Stablecoins promise freedom, but without the right choreography, they can just relocate your liquidity bottlenecks from boardrooms to blockchains. A Treasurer’s Take: 5 Bold Moves towards Digital Liquidity (2026-2027) As treasurers, we know theory is cheap—execution is the real score. So, let’s talk brass tacks: What would moving toward continuous orchestration look like in practice? Here’s how you could approach it: How Close is the Crescendo? Closer than the skeptics admit, but not quite the full symphony yet. We’ve got the instruments: Scaled, audited stablecoins; institutional custody that’s treasury-tough; and central banks tinkering with tokenized deposits. Still, the gaps echo: Fiat-stablecoin bridges in every currency? I say give it another 18-24 months for the market to catch up. Universal tax clarity? Regulators are warming up, but it’s a slow adagio. And trust in smart-contract automation for non-crypto pros? That’s the finale we need to be composing for now. My bet: By 2028, hybrid stacks will be standard for most multinationals—some hitting the high notes in 2026, with trailblazers already in rehearsal. The question isn’t if continuous liquidity arrives; it’s who will lead the performance, and who will scramble for seats in the orchestra pit. Ready treasurers will move beyond theory and join the jam—building liquid, resilient, and programmable cash stacks for tomorrow’s markets. If you’re sketching hybrid architectures where fiat, stablecoins, and tokenized assets improvise together, let’s tune this thing together. The future of corporate liquidity isn’t a solo; it’s a collaboration waiting for its cue. So, what’s the thorniest trap in your liquidity score right now—regulatory fog, technology silos, or something else? Lorena Pérez Sandroni, Treasury Masterminds Board Member, Comments For me, as I have expressed in other times, stablecoins aren’t about chasing hype. They are about solving a very real speed problem in treasury. I see them as a practical instrument in the liquidity orchestra, especially when we are constantly battling cut-off times, slow FX rails, and capital stuck in limbo. But I stay pragmatic: cross-border FX rules, tax treatment, and uneven regulatory clarity mean you can’t just “go on-chain,” And honestly, the hardest part isn’t the technology—it’s shifting traditional minds that still equate digital assets with speculation. When you’re explaining that you don’t want crypto, you want faster balance-sheet mobility, you can almost feel the cognitive dissonance in the room. But that’s exactly why stablecoins matter: used carefully, they’re a tool for speed, precision, and…