The EBITDA Illusion: Why Your Profit Isn’t Reaching the Bank

Written by:
Jelle Goossens

Executive Summary

The belief that cash flow management is primarily a treasury concern while senior management focuses on EBITDA and profit metrics is not just operationally problematic; it is contradicted by decades of academic finance research and by the observable evidence of how corporate value is created – and, more often, quietly destroyed.

This article makes the case that free cash flow (“FCF”) is a strategic senior leadership priority, not a back-office function. It provides the academic and institutional evidence finance professionals need when approaching executive leadership, supported by quantified examples drawn from a representative mid-market manufacturing company with €350M in annual revenue.

1. The Problem: EBITDA is Not Cash

The dominant management metric in European corporates is EBITDA. It is easy to benchmark and intuitively linked to operating performance, but it carries a fundamental and underappreciated blind spot. EBITDA excludes capital expenditures and changes in working capital – this is not a minor technical distinction; it means a business can report healthy EBITDA while quietly deteriorating in liquidity.

Revenue can be recognized and margins can look fine, yet cash can be disappearing. EBITDA was developed in the mid-1970s primarily as a presentation tool before it became a management tool – and its limitations have followed it ever since. Free cash flow, by contrast, reflects what the business actually produces and captures operating profitability, capital expenditure, and working capital discipline in a single number.

2. The Root Cause: Incentive Misalignment

When accounting and FP&A teams focus on EBITDA, they are responding to the incentives they have been given. The problem is structural. Michael Jensen’s foundational 1986 paper established the “free cash flow hypothesis”: when managers are not held accountable for cash generation, they tend to retain cash or direct it toward value-neutral growth investments.

If Sales is incentivized on revenue booked, Procurement on cost savings negotiated, and Operations on throughput, none of those functions have a structural reason to optimize the cash conversion cycle. The gap between revenue recognition and actual cash receipt – which can reach 120 to 180 days in practice – is not an operational accident; it is a predictable consequence of misaligned KPIs.

3. The Belgian Benchmark: Why Working Capital Drives Profitability

Academic evidence linking active working capital management to corporate profitability is extensive. Marc Deloof’s 2003 study of 1,009 large Belgian firms found unambiguous results:

• Managers who reduce days accounts receivable and days inventory materially improve operating income.
• Less profitable firms consistently wait longer to pay their bills – a sign of reactive rather than managed cash flow.
• The relationship between working capital intensity and profitability is negative and statistically significant.

Shortening the Cash Conversion Cycle (“CCC”) is equivalent to unlocking working capital at zero financing cost. Every day eliminated from the cycle is capital that no longer needs to be funded.

4. The Numbers: Two Companies, One Cash Reality

These examples are based on a representative manufacturing company with €350M in annual revenue and €35M EBITDA (10% margin).

Example 1: The EBITDA Illusion Company A and Company B are identical in size and reported EBITDA. The only difference is working capital discipline.

At identical EBITDA, Company B generates €3.1M less in free cash flow annually and carries €62.3M more in working capital on its balance sheet. At a 5% cost of debt, the annual drag from this trapped capital is approximately €3.1M – erasing nearly a full percentage point of EBITDA margin.

Example 2: The CCC Value Unlock For a €350M revenue business, each day of the CCC represents approximately €959,000 in working capital.

• A 10-day improvement in the CCC releases €9.6M in working capital.
• A 30-day improvement saves over €1.4M per year in annual financing costs at zero incremental revenue.

5. The “Invisible Discount” in Payment Terms

Sales teams frequently treat extended payment terms as a commercial decision, but it is actually a financing decision. Consider a single customer with €10M in annual revenue:

• Standard (30-day payment): ~€822k receivable.
• Extended (90-day payment): ~€2.47M receivable.
• Financing Drag: Extending to 90 days ties up an extra €1.64M, costing €82,000 per year in annual financing at a 5% cost of capital.

That cost does not appear in the deal approval. The Sales team hits its target, but the “invisible discount” erodes the firm’s cash position.

6. The Management Imperative

Practical leadership ownership of cash culture rests on three pillars:

1. Authority: Conflicts between Sales (seeking loose terms) and Finance (requiring liquidity) must be resolved by senior leadership.
2. Visibility: Cross-functional workshops must translate abstract treasury metrics into the language each function understands: margin impact and working capital cost.
3. Sustainability: Without cash-linked KPIs at the senior level, any improvement will erode as teams revert to the metrics they are rewarded on.

7. Recommended First Steps

1. Map Incentives: Identify where cash metrics are currently absent in Sales, Procurement, and Operations.
2. Dashboard Visibility: Review a CCC dashboard monthly alongside EBITDA at the leadership level.
3. Pilot Workshops: Use a real case to quantify the distance between revenue recognition and cash receipt.
4. Budget Cycle: Propose working capital improvement targets for business unit heads.
5. Link Compensation: Tie a portion of management bonuses to FCF conversion or CCC improvement.

Closing Argument

Cash is not a treasury metric; it is the one financial metric that cannot be managed through accounting choices. “Cash is King” is not a slogan – it is a statement about what survives when earnings management and optimistic assumptions eventually meet reality. The difference between thriving and struggling is often not strategy, but the management culture that demands cash discipline.

Also Read

• Sustaining Financial Clarity as Organisations Grow.
• Oil Price Shocks: The Treasury Domino Effect
• Webinar Recap: Cash Flow Forecasting on Trial
• Should Cyber Risk (and Insurance) Be on the Treasurer’s Agenda?
• What does commodity volatility mean for treasurers?
• ISO 20022 for corporates: the change you can’t ignore (even if you’d like to)
• Treasury Trends for 2026: Building Smarter, Faster and More Resilient Treasury Functions
• Treasury Trends for 2026: Building Smarter, Faster and More Resilient Treasury Functions
• Webinar Recap: De-Dollarisation & How Treasurers Can Build the Right Hedging Strategy

Join our Treasury Community

Treasury Mastermind is a community of professionals working in treasury management and those interested in learning more about topics such as cash management, foreign exchange management, and payments. To register and connect with Treasury professionals, click [HERE] or fill out the form below to get more information.