

Written by Craig Haymaker
Hedge accounting is powerful. It allows corporate treasurers to manage the risk inherent in foreign exchange (FX) exposures while reducing earnings volatility. By aligning the accounting for hedging instruments with the underlying risk exposure, hedge accounting provides a more accurate reflection of economic reality.
However, hedge accounting can be complex and time-consuming without sufficient experience and knowledge of the guidance. While IFRS 9 introduced flexibility in certain areas, IAS 39 remains relevant for some organizations due to its stricter rules for hedge accounting qualification. Here’s a comprehensive checklist, along with actionable tips and tricks, to streamline the process under either framework.
1. Understand the Basics of Hedge Accounting Standards
The two most commonly applied accounting standards for hedge accounting are IAS 39 and IFRS 9:
- IAS 39 is a rules-based accounting framework that prescribes more stringent, quantitative criteria for defining hedge relationships. Although more rigid, users find that IAS 39 is clearer in terms of what qualifies and what does not for hedge accounting.
- IFRS 9 is principles-based, allowing entities more flexibility to define their risk management objectives and more latitude with how they measure hedged risk exposure. It also introduces a more qualitative approach to assessing hedge effectiveness.
Tip: Check which standard applies to your organization. If transitioning from IAS 39 to IFRS 9 is an option, assess how the flexibility of IFRS 9 might benefit your processes and reporting.
Both standards recognize three primary types of hedges for FX:
- Fair Value Hedge: Mitigates risk associated with changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment due to FX fluctuations.
- Cash Flow Hedge: Reduces variability in future cash flows related to forecasted transactions or firm commitments denominated in a non-functional currency.
- Net Investment Hedge: Decreases risk related to FX translation volatility arising from net investments in foreign operations.
A clearly defined hedge relationship will involve a hedging instrument, or portfolio of hedging instruments, and a hedged item. Often, the hedging instrument is a derivative designed to reduce risk based on its underlying asset, rate, or index. The hedged item represents the critical terms of the risk exposure being hedged. Hedged item(s) could be assets, liabilities, forecasted cash flows, or equity-related balances driving the variability in expected future cash flows, changes in fair value, or reported investments in foreign operations. Both the hedging instrument(s) and hedged item(s) must be carefully and comprehensively identified within an entity’s documentation.
2. Build a Strong Hedge Accounting Framework
A robust framework ensures compliance regardless of the standard you follow. Key elements include:
- Documentation: Both IAS 39 and IFRS 9 require formal documentation of the hedging relationship, but IAS 39 has stricter requirements for specifying how hedge effectiveness is assessed. Frequently known as hedge designation memoranda, the document should include the following:
- Defined hedged risk and risk management objective
- Description of the hedging instrument and hedged item
- Initial and ongoing methods for assessing hedge effectiveness
- Sources of ineffectiveness that are known and could affect the relationship in the future
- Nature, timing, and extent of financial statement impact
- Hedge Effectiveness Testing: IAS 39 mandates both prospective and retrospective testing, requiring a statistical or quantitative demonstration of effectiveness within a range of 80-125%. IFRS 9 simplifies this by only requiring a qualitative assessment that should include a proven economic relationship between the hedging instrument and hedged item, a clearly defined hedge ratio, and consideration for the effect of credit risk on the hedge relationship.
Checklist:
- Clearly define the hedging objective and the risk being hedged.
- Quantify the magnitude and timing of the risk exposure to inform the hedging strategy.
- Identify the hedged item and hedging instrument.
- Document the relationship, testing methods, and financial statement impact.
- Regularly test hedge effectiveness (prospectively and retrospectively under IAS 39).
Tip: Use treasury management systems (TMS) to automate documentation and effectiveness testing to reduce manual errors and meet requirements.
3. Choose the Right Hedging Instruments
The choice of hedging instruments must align with both your risk profile and the accounting standard requirements. Common instruments include forwards, options, and currency swaps.
Tip: Under IAS 39, certain instruments (e.g., peculiar options) may not qualify due to stricter eligibility rules. Stick to simple and liquid instruments like forward contracts and vanilla options to simplify compliance.
Trick: IFRS 9 allows you to exclude items such as changes in time value or forward points. For example, when hedging anticipated expenses denominated in a foreign currency across a given time period, the excluded forward element can be amortized to the statement of profit / loss over the life of the hedge, easing earnings impact.
4. Accurately Forecast FX Exposures
For cash flow hedges, forecasted transactions must be “highly probable” to occur in order to qualify as an eligible hedged item under both IAS 39 and IFRS 9.
Checklist:
- Validate forecasts using historical data and internal planning.
- Regularly monitor and update forecasts to ensure they remain relevant.
- Track variances to identify trends and adjust hedging ratios as needed. For example, in periods where the probability of occurrence is less than others, an entity should reduce the amount hedged as a reflection of that reduced probability.
Tip: Involve key stakeholders (e.g., FP&A, procurement, and sales teams) to improve forecast accuracy and compliance.
5. Conduct Regular Hedge Effectiveness Testing
Under IAS 39, hedge effectiveness must fall within the strict range of 80-125%, making it more challenging to qualify. IFRS 9, however, allows more qualitative or principle-based assessments, provided the hedge relationship is aligned with the risk management objective.
Checklist:
- Perform quantitative effectiveness testing (e.g., regression analysis, stress/scenario analysis) for compliance. This quantitative test will extinguish any doubt as to the highly effective nature of the hedge relationship.
- Use the critical terms match approach where applicable. This means that the critical terms of the hedging instrument align with those of the hedged item, allowing for more favourable accounting treatment without the need for periodic effectiveness testing.
- Monitor and document changes in effectiveness regularly, especially after significant market events.
Trick: If your hedge fails effectiveness testing under IAS 39, consider redesignating the hedge using a different hedging strategy or hedging an alternative risk exposure to reset compliance and recapture earnings stability.
6. Understand Hedge Ineffectiveness and Adjustments
Hedge ineffectiveness can arise from mismatches in the timing, currency, or amount of the hedged item and the hedging instrument. Valuation adjustments arising from the risk of non-performance, or counterparty credit risk, can also create a mismatch. This is because counterparty credit risk is considered only for the hedging instrument and not the hedged item.
Tip: Avoid mismatches by ensuring critical terms (e.g., amount, currency, and maturity) between the hedging instrument and the hedged item are aligned.
Trick: For cash flow hedges under IFRS 9, use hypothetical derivatives to mirror the critical terms of the hedged item to simplify ineffectiveness measurement. Applying a hedge ratio to the hypothetical derivative can help promote a highly effective hedge relationship.
7. Stay Compliant with Your Applicable Standard
Compliance with accounting standards is non-negotiable. IAS 39 is more stringent in several areas, including hedged item eligibility criteria, testing, and measurement. IFRS 9 introduces simplifications and greater flexibility that reduce operational burdens while maintaining transparency.
Checklist:
- Regularly review changes in accounting standards that may affect hedge accounting (e.g., IASB or FASB updates).
- Engage auditors early to validate your hedge accounting processes.
- Provide detailed disclosures in financial statements as required.
Tip: Keep comprehensive documentation of hedge accounting processes and test results, especially if your organization still applies IAS 39.
8. Leverage Technology for Efficiency
Whether under IAS 39 or IFRS 9, manual processes can be error prone. Treasury management systems (TMS) or specialized hedge accounting software can streamline your operations.
Tip: Look for solutions that support dual compliance if you operate in jurisdictions requiring IAS 39 and IFRS 9 simultaneously.
Trick: Automate repetitive tasks like hedge documentation, effectiveness testing, and compliance reporting to reduce administrative overhead.
Final Thoughts
Applying hedge accounting for FX hedging requires a well-structured framework, accurate data, and meticulous execution. While IAS 39 remains relevant for some organizations, IFRS 9 offers increased flexibility, making it worthwhile to explore transitioning if allowed.
By following this checklist and leveraging the tips and tricks provided here, you can simplify the complexities of hedge accounting, enhance risk management, and achieve better alignment with your hedging strategy.
Are you ready to optimize your FX hedging and embrace hedge accounting under the relevant standard? Share your thoughts, experiences, or questions in the comments below!
Also Read
- Treasury needs to be it’s own DOGE
- Understanding Bank Treasury: Managing Liquidity, Risk, and Regulatory Compliance
- Challenges in Payment Operations: Insights from Modern Treasury’s Survey
- Treasury Contrarian View: The Case Against In-House Banks
- Trends Transforming the Current Treasury Management System (TMS) Landscape
- Treasury Contrarian View: Are Treasury Certifications Still Worth It?
- Treasury Contrarian View: Treasury Without Borders—Should Treasury Teams Go 100% Remote?
- Treasury Contrarian View: Why Stop at 100% Hedging?
- Treasury Contrarian View: Banks vs. Fintechs – Should Treasurers Bet on Smaller Players?
- Lessons from 10 Years of Failing to Sell My Dad Treasury Software
- The 12 Myths of Treasury: Debunking Misconceptions and Raising Awareness
Join our Treasury Community
Treasury Mastermind is a community of professionals working in treasury management or those interested in learning more about various topics related to treasury management, including cash management, foreign exchange management, and payments. To register and connect with Treasury professionals, click [HERE] or fill out the form below to get more information.